That said, understanding how cases are generally valued can help you make sense of the process and avoid some common misconceptions.

Understanding the two types of damages

Every personal injury case is built on two categories of damages: economic and non economic.

Economic damages are the measurable financial losses. These include medical bills, lost wages, future medical care, and any other out of pocket expenses related to the injury. These numbers are straightforward because they can be supported with records and documentation.

Non economic damages are different. These include pain, suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and the overall impact the injury has had on your day to day existence. There is no receipt for these losses, which makes them more subjective. This is where the true story of your injury matters.

Why there is no fixed formula

You may have heard that personal injury cases are valued by multiplying medical bills by some number. While this idea is often repeated, it is overly simplistic and frequently wrong.

The reality is that not all medical bills are treated equally. A large bill does not automatically mean a valuable case, and a smaller bill does not mean the opposite.

For example, diagnostic testing like MRIs or CT scans may generate significant charges. But if those tests do not show any injury, they may carry less weight in terms of overall case value. On the other hand, bills tied to meaningful treatment, like physical therapy, injections, or surgery, tend to matter more because they reflect actual injury and recovery efforts.

At the same time, there are serious injuries that may not come with enormous medical bills but are still clearly high value. An amputation is a good example. Even if the initial treatment costs are relatively contained, the lifelong impact of that injury is profound. That type of case is valued based on the permanent loss and life changes, not just the bills.

What really drives case value

When experienced personal injury attorneys evaluate a case, they are looking beyond just the numbers. They are looking at the full picture.

The severity of the injury is often the most important factor. Minor soft tissue injuries typically resolve and carry lower value. More serious injuries like fractures, disc injuries, or those requiring surgery increase value. Permanent or life altering injuries increase it significantly.

The quality and consistency of medical treatment also matters. Cases with prompt care, consistent follow up, and clear documentation tend to be stronger. Gaps in treatment or unexplained delays can raise questions and reduce value.

Liability plays a major role as well. Even a serious injury can be discounted if fault is unclear or disputed. In California, if you are partially at fault, your recovery can be reduced based on your percentage of responsibility.

Another key factor is how the injury has affected your daily life. If you can no longer work the same job, participate in activities you once enjoyed, or care for your family in the same way, those changes matter. The more your life has been disrupted, the more significant your non economic damages tend to be.

Finally, credibility is critical. Your complaints need to align with your medical records and your treatment history. Consistency and honesty go a long way in increasing the perceived value of a case.

Why similar cases can have very different outcomes

Two cases that look similar on paper can have very different values.

One person may have high medical bills but little objective evidence of injury and minimal ongoing complaints. That case may resolve for a modest amount.

Another person may have moderate medical bills but strong imaging, consistent treatment, and clear limitations in daily life. That case may be worth significantly more.

And in catastrophic injury cases, the value may far exceed what the medical bills alone would suggest because of the long term consequences.

The bottom line

There is no single number that defines what your personal injury case is worth. It is not just about adding up bills or applying a multiplier. It is about understanding how the injury has affected your life and how well that impact can be demonstrated.

A proper evaluation takes experience, careful analysis, and a clear understanding of both the legal and human aspects of the case. If you are trying to understand the value of your claim, the best approach is to look at the full picture rather than relying on shortcuts. Call us here at North County Injury Lawyers if you have questions about your personal injury case.

North County Injury Lawyers is a boutique personal injury law firm dedicated to helping individuals and families throughout North County San Diego who have been seriously injured due to negligence. We focus on high-impact cases, including car accidents, catastrophic injuries, and wrongful death, providing personalized, hands-on representation from start to finish.

Our firm is deeply rooted in the communities we serve, including Oceanside, Carlsbad, Vista, San Marcos, Escondido, and surrounding areas. We understand the local roads, healthcare providers, and insurance dynamics that often shape these cases, which allows us to advocate more effectively for our clients.

How Could This Happen in a Pizza Parlor?

While a pizza parlor might not immediately conjure images of heavy industrial risks, professional kitchen machinery, like large-scale dough mixers, rollers, and cutters, poses significant hazards. Entrapment injuries—where a body part gets caught, crushed, or pulled into a moving mechanism—typically occur due to a few common factors:

• Missing or Bypassed Safety Guards:

• Lack of Lockout/Tagout Procedures: Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) is a critical safety protocol. When a machine is being serviced, cleaned, or unjammed, it must be completely disconnected from its energy source (locked out) and tagged. Failure to follow LOTO means the machine could be inadvertently started while an employee is reaching into the mechanism.
• Fatigue or Distraction: Repetitive tasks and long hours can lead to a momentary lapse in concentration, causing an employee to slip, misjudge a movement, or reach into an area they shouldn’t while the machine is running.
• Equipment Malfunction: Less common, but still a risk, is a mechanical or electrical failure that causes a part to move unexpectedly or a safety shutoff to fail.

In the case of a dough cutter, an employee may have been attempting to clear a jam, clean excess dough, or adjust a setting while the cutting blade or roller was still powered, leading to the severe injury.

Understanding California Product Liability Law

When a workplace injury like this occurs, the employee’s primary recourse is through Workers’ Compensation. However, the incident also raises serious questions about the equipment itself and the manufacturer’s responsibility under California Product Liability Law.

A manufacturer can be held liable if a piece of equipment is found to be “defective” and that defect caused the injury. California law recognizes three main types of product defects:

1. Manufacturing Defect: The product differs from the manufacturer’s intended design (e.g., a critical weld breaks).
2. Design Defect: The product’s design itself creates an unreasonable danger to the consumer or user, and there was a safer, economical, and technically feasible alternative design available. In the context of industrial equipment, this often involves the placement or effectiveness of safety guards and shutoff mechanisms. If the pizza dough cutter’s design made it too easy to bypass safety guards, it could be deemed defective.
3. Failure to Warn (Marketing Defect): The manufacturer failed to provide adequate warnings or instructions about non-obvious dangers associated with the product’s use.

For the pizza parlor incident, the critical question under product liability would be: Did the dough-cutting machine create an unreasonable danger to the employee? If the design of the guard system was insufficient to prevent access to the moving blades during normal operation or foreseeable misuse, the manufacturer could be held accountable, distinct from the employer’s liability. This is crucial because a successful product liability claim can provide the injured worker with compensation for pain, suffering, and lost wages beyond what Workers’ Compensation offers.

The tragic event serves as a critical call for all businesses to rigorously enforce safety protocols, and for manufacturers to prioritize worker safety above all else when designing and building the tools of the trade.

We hope the employee makes a fully recovery.

Yet, in order to actually get any of this compensation, you will need to pay attention to deadlines. Often, you will see deadlines described in terms of the “statute of limitations.” What is the statute of limitations, and how much time does it give someone to file an injury claim?

Understanding the “Statute of Limitations”

The term “statute of limitations” refers to the time window in which a person or entity can file a lawsuit. This term is used in civil law (the area of the law in which personal injury cases are filed) as well as criminal law, and there are different statutes of limitations for different types of cases. Within civil law, statutes of limitations vary depending on the type of legal harm the injured person has incurred.

In general, you can think of a statute of limitations as a clock. Once the time window for filing a claim opens up, you can think of that moment as when the clock starts “ticking.” The clock will continue ticking until the time window is up. Once that time window is up and the clock has run out, any possible claim a party could have filed will have become “time-barred.” A time-barred claim is one that is no longer permitted because of the amount of time that has passed. There are some instances in which a statute of limitations can be paused (known as “tolling” a statute of limitations), but you should never count on the statute of limitations being paused in your case.

What is the Statute of Limitations for My Personal Injury Case?

If you are planning to file an insurance claim after an Escondido personal injury accident, the state’s statute of limitations does not apply to that claim. However, it is important to remember that you might need to file a lawsuit if an insurance payout is insufficient, so you should keep a close eye on the statute of limitations.

For most personal injury lawsuits, California law has a two-year statute of limitations. There are, however, some types of injury cases where an initial claim must be filed much sooner — within six months or one year — in cases involving public property, government parties, or similar.

Contact a Escondido Personal Injury Lawyer

To make sure you file your California personal injury lawsuit on time, you should get in touch with an experienced Rancho Bernardo personal injury attorney at our firm as soon as possible. Contact the North County Injury Lawyers today for assistance with your case.

See Related Blog Posts:

New Funding Efforts to Reduce California Bicycle and Pedestrian Deaths

What is the School Bus Danger Zone?

In addition to voting against the medical malpractice cap increase, Californians also voted down an initiative that would have “required routine drug and alcohol testing for hospital doctors,” thereby reducing the number of preventable injuries in hospitals.

Background of the Medical Malpractice Cap Initiative

Just to remind you about Proposition 46 and how it would have changed medical negligence laws, we can take a look at the elements of the initiative. First and foremost, it sought to raise the state’s medical malpractice cap on non-economic compensatory damages from $250,000 to $1.1. million. Noneconomic damages are those for injuries like pain and suffering, which one cannot objectively quantifiy. The $250,000 cap was set back in 1975 with the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA). In addition, Proposition 46 would have resulted in some of the following changes:

• Allowing for additional changes to the cap based on inflation; back in 1975, accounting for inflation, the $250,000 cap is closer to about $57,000 in the 2010s;
• Requiring hospital doctors to be tested for drugs and alcohol, and requiring doctors that test positive to report their results to the California Medical Board;
• Requiring the suspension of doctors who test positive for drugs and alcohol, pending an investigation; if the doctor tested positive while on duty, the initiative would have required the California Medical Board to take disciplinary action;
• Requiring other healthcare professionals to report doctors who may be impaired by drugs or alcohol, or who may have committed medical negligence;
• Requiring healthcare providers who prescribe medications to consult the California prescription drug history database before providing prescriptions for some controlled substances.

Yet the initiative did not pass, and none of these important changes were made to California law. Why did voters not want to make sure some of these changes went into effect?

Why the Medical Malpractice Initiative Failed

According to the Wall Street Journal article, the “no” votes for Proposition 46 outnumbered the “yes” votes by nearly double—those opposed to the initiative won with a 2-to-1 margin. Why did more voters not say “yes” to Proposition 46?

Advertising may have played a considerable role in the voting numbers. Medical malpractice insurers provided substantial funding for the opposition campaign, raising nearly $58 million in total according to MapLight, which is a “nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that tracks campaign contributions.” All of that funding seems to have washed out the proponents of Proposition 46, who managed to raise about $8.5 million to promote the initiative. As such, the medical malpractice cap for non-economic damages will remain firmly at $250,000.

If you have questions about filing a claim for medical malpractice, it is very important to discuss your case with an experienced San Diego medical malpractice lawyer. Although the cap for certain damages remains at $250,000, you may potentially file a claim for substantial compensation for your injuries. Contact the Walton Law Firm today.

See Related Blog Posts: Patients at Risk of Injury in Smaller Military Hospitals Medical Error Prevention and Medical Malpractice Legislation

When you have sustained an injury in a severe accident, it is important to seek immediate medical care. Only a trained healthcare professional can assess the severity of your injuries, and this assessment can be essential to winning a personal injury lawsuit in Southern California. Yet the high price of an ambulance ride can deter injury victims from seeking immediate treatment after an accident. Should ambulance bills really cost such a high price? And why are they not covered by all health insurance plans?

An article in the New York Times reported that a swim instructor in La Jolla, California sustained an injury in the pool where she worked, and another person at the facility called 911 for an ambulance. The victim, Kira Milas, 23, had “swum into the side of the pool, breaking three teeth.” The ambulance arrived, and it took Milas to Scripps Memorial Hospital. Paramedics applied a neck brace as a precautionary measure. While Milas is one of the lucky accident victims who did not necessarily require an ambulance trip to the hospital, her story about the massive ambulance bill is all too common in Southern California and, indeed, across the country.

A week after her release from the hospital, Milas received a bill for her fifteen-minute trip to Scripps Memorial Hospital totaling nearly $1,800. Fortunately for Milas, her ambulance bill was paid by workers’ compensation insurance. However, it is not uncommon for an ambulance ride like Milas’, covering fewer than ten miles, to cost upwards of $2,000. For low-income injury victims, the prospect of paying for an ambulance can result in failing to receive the proper treatment and at the right time.

Ambulance Billing and Insurance Coverage

According to the New York Times, ambulance rides—even a few decades ago—used to be provided “free of charge, underwritten by taxpayers as a municipal service or provided by volunteers.” Now, however, ambulances are run more like other businesses, and they can result in extremely high medical bills. Indeed, the patient almost always receives the bill for his or her ambulance, and that bill can “range widely, from zero to tens of thousands of dollars.”

Even patients with health insurance can end up with a costly ambulance bill. To be sure, many patients simply do not have coverage for an ambulance ride. And the pricing can vary drastically depending on who is running the ambulance. Some ambulances are run by fire departments and volunteer groups, while other are run by hospitals and private companies. In short, “no two are alike,” according to Dr. Robert E. O’Connor, who serves as the vice president of the American College of Emergency Medicine.

Given that the pricing varies widely, it is often difficult to estimate the out-of-pocket expenses for a particular patient. And because ambulances typically only transport patients in emergency situations, there is not a lot of time to “shop around,” so to speak.

If you were injured in an accident, it is important to receive proper medical care. Although ambulance rides can be expensive, they are very important for ensuring that you get the treatment you need. In accidents caused by another person’s negligence or wrongdoing, you may be eligible to seek financial compensation. Contact an experienced San Diego personal injury lawyer today to learn more about how we can assist with your case. We may be able to help you negotiate the cost of your ambulance ride in addition to providing counsel for your personal injury claim.

Photo Credit: o0o0xmods0o0o via morgueFile See Related Blog Posts: Spinal Cord Injury Breakthroughs: Fact or Fiction? Patients at Risk of Injury in Smaller Military Hospitals

A lot of terms exist to suggest that a facility provides high quality care. Yet it’s important to remember that neither the price tag associated with a facility, nor its accreditation or certification status, can promise a safe environment for a loved one battling addiction.

Drug Rehab Facility Safety in California

In California, the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) has “sole authority to license facilities providing 24-hour residential nonmedical services to eligible adults who are recovering from problems related to alcohol or other drug misuse or abuse.” When must a facility be licensed by the state of California? If the facility provides one of the following services, then it’s required to be licensed by DHCS:

• Detoxification;
• Group sessions;
• Individual sessions;
• Educational sessions;
• Alcoholism or drug abuse recover; or
• Alcoholism or drug abuse treatment planning.

Certification is different from being licensed. A number of facilities that are licensed are also certified. But according to the DHCS website, “certification by DHCS identifies those facilities which exceed minimum levels of service quality and are in substantial compliance with State program standards, specifically the Alcohol and/or Other Drug Certification Standards.”

In other words, a facility that’s both licensed and certified is likely to have met higher standards than other facilities. But those terms alone can’t always promise quality care. And how do they compare to accredited facilities?

Accreditation Standards for Drug Rehab Facilities

According to a recent article in Psych Central, accreditation isn’t synonymous with quality treatment. Why not? First thing’s first: not all accreditation is equal. In fact, many accredited facilities haven’t been licensed by the state to provide care for people seeking to overcome alcohol or drug addiction. Instead, many facilities have been accredited by third parties. And some of these third-party accreditors aren’t as thorough as others.

In most cases, facilities seek accreditation either from CARF (the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities) or The Joint Commission. Generally speaking, “facilities that meet CARF or Joint Commission standards have demonstrated their commitment to being among the best drug rehab facilities in the world.” And in some states, accreditation by one of these facilities can go toward fulfillment of certain licensing requirements.

Yet we need to remember that simply being licensed or accredited doesn’t ensure excellent care. Indeed, patients sustain injuries and endure abuse even at high-end facilities that have been licensed in California or accredited by CRF. According to the article, “several correlations exist between accreditation and quality care, but the association isn’t uniform across all accredited programs.”

Accreditation is one of the “best indicators of quality that we have,” according to Dr. David Sack, who is board certified in psychiatry, addiction psychiatry, and addiction medicine. However, rather than simply rely on a facility’s price tag, its certification status, or its accreditation status, it’s essential that you “do your homework.”

If you or a loved one sustained injuries due to abuse or neglect in a California drug rehab facility, the Walton Law Firm can help. Even high-end facilities can be held accountable for abuse, and we can discuss your options with you today. Contact a San Diego personal injury lawyer to learn more.

Photo Credit: JohnONolan via Compfight cc See Related Blog Posts: Abuse, Violence, and Wrongful Death in High-End Rehab Facilities Medical Malpractice Initiative Will Appear on November Ballot

Rehab Facilities with a History of Abuse

Are high-end drug rehabilitation facilities really places where patient safety is a serious issue? Unfortunately, abuse can occur anywhere, and patient injuries and deaths can result. In some cases, employees at these kinds of facilities commit sexual abuse and violence against patients. In other cases, there’s just a poor quality of care, and preventable injuries happen.

For example, the One80 Center in Los Angeles, an “A-list Hollywood rehab,” according to the Los Angeles Times, recently was exposed as a dangerous rehabilitation facility in California. Over the last few years, two patients died after sustaining fatal injuries in a drowning accident and an Oxycontin overdose. According to a story about those deaths that appeared in the Hollywood Reporter, the rehabilitation facility is a “luxury addiction treatment provider” that houses some of its services in a “$2.9 million Cape Cod-style house on lower Sunset Plaza Drive.”

The first victim, a 52-year-old woman seeking treatment at the facility, Jean Galletta, threatened to “go upstairs, take a bath, and drown myself.” The caretakers at the One80 facility didn’t believe her. Moments later, staff members found the victim in her bathtub. They “placed a bag valve mask over her face and furiously worked an automatic external defibrillator” in an “unsuccessful attempt to revive her.” At her time of death, Galletta’s blood alcohol content was listed at 0.24, which is “enough to lose consciousness.” Following her death, many clients and patient advocates suspected that Galletta’s death had been preventable, as it resulted from improper care at One80.

Less than a year prior, One80 lost another client under questionable circumstances. In August 2011, a 22-year-old overdosed on Oxycontin. The victim, Andrew Witkoff, had been the son of a “Manhattan real estate titan.” He smuggled the drugs into his bedroom, a “sober-living sanctum.” Similar to Galletta’s death, commentators believe Witkoff’s death was the result of improper care at the rehabilitation facility.

High-End Care Hindering Recovery?

According to the story in the Hollywood Reporter, clients come to high-end rehabilitation facilities when they’re at their most vulnerable—they’re in “perilous physical and mental health.” And because these facilities often give “special privileges” to the wealthiest of Americans in need of drug or alcohol rehabilitation, those clients often don’t end up getting the level of care they actually need.

For clients like Witkoff and Galletta, facilities such as the One80 can charge about $90,000 per month for treatment. But that price doesn’t mean that patients are receiving proper care. For example, staff members at some of these high-end facilities have come forward shedding light on realities at the facilities. They’ve emphasized that many clients actually need psychiatric treatment at specialized facilities, yet the owners of luxury rehabilitation clinics such as One80 opt to encourage the expensive monthly payments from these clients instead.

“When you have something extreme” in addition to a drug or alcohol addiction, one staff member asserted, such as “eating disorders, schizophrenia, bipolar with psychotic features—clients need true psychiatric care to get better with their addiction.” Without such care, staff members warn, “you’re setting people up for failure.”

Has your loved one sustained injuries at a high-end drug rehabilitation facility? It’s important to discuss your case with an experienced San Diego personal injury attorney. Whether your serious injuries resulted from poor care or an intentional act, we can help you to seek compensation. Contact us today to learn more.

Photo Credit: Dean812 via Compfight cc See Related Blog Posts: California Earns “F” Grade for Emergency Room Capacities $9 Million UC Davis Medical Malpractice Settlement

Compensatory damages are intended to make up for an injury sustained by a victim. There are two basic types of compensatory damages: actual and general. Actual damages compensate the victim for any money they paid out of pocket for medical treatments, lost wages, property replacement, and rehabilitation as a result of their injury. General damages include mental anguish, disfigurement, future medical expenses, future lost wages, long-term pain and suffering, loss of consortium and loss of opportunity.

Punitive damages are meant to punish a defendant for gross negligence or intentional misconduct causing a personal injury. The amount of damages will depend upon the defendant, as they will need the compensation will need to be enough to dissuade the defendant from similar future conduct.

Nominal damages are awarded where the actual damage is slight, but the court chooses to award a small sum of money to acknowledge the defendant’s wrongdoing. Generally, nominal damages are more about the principle issue, rather than the actual damages.

Discrimination Claims

Under the Civil Rights Act of 1991, which covers most discrimination claims including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, damages are limited by the number of employees. It is important to note that these federal statutes does not apply to employers with fewer than 15 employees.

· 15-100 employees = $50,000 · 101-200 employees = $100,000 · 201-500 employees = $200,000 · More than 500 employees = $300,000 There are loopholes to avoid theses damage caps, however, by making additional claims under state law as well.

Federal Tort Claims Act

When you are injured by a federal employee, or by federal property, you must bring your lawsuit under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Under this act, the laws of the state where the accident occurred control damages limitations. For example, in New Mexico, medical malpractice damages are capped at $600,000, excluding past and future medical care.

The Federal Tort Claims Act prohibits awarding punitive damages. Therefore, even if you would normally be entitled to seek punitive damages in a lawsuit against a private individual, you many not seek punitive damages against the federal government. Punitive Damages

While not limited by statute, there have been situations where the federal courts have limited the amount of punitive damages a jury may award. Generally, an award of punitive damages may be overturned if the ratio of punitive to compensatory damages is deemed too great. Particularly if the defendant’s conduct does not involve reckless disregard for health or safety, or bad faith.

“Sovereign immunity” previously protected governments from lawsuits. Now, the federal government and many state governments, including California, have tort claims acts that allow the government to be sued and found liable in a limited number of circumstances. Determining which tort claims statute applies will depend upon whether the injury resulted on or by federal government property, state government property, or local government property.

Under the California Tort Claims Act, the victim is required to file a claim against the state or local government entity within six months of the injury. If the victim misses the deadline, a claim may still be allowed but only in very limited circumstances. After the claim is filed, the government has 45 days to respond. If the government fails to respond to the claim, it is treated as rejected and the victim has six months to file a lawsuit. If the governmental entity fails to notify the victim of a decision within 45 days, then the victim has 2 years from the date of the injury to file a lawsuit. Under the California Tort Claims Act, the victim cannot recover punitive damages and the governmental entity can elect to make installment payments if it does not have commercial insurance.

Slip and Fall Cases A slip and fall case often presents a certain set of challenges, beyond those that result from suing the government. A property owner will have several defenses in a premises liability case. First, the problem that caused the accident must have been present long enough for the property owner or occupier to know about it. Proving knowledge of the defect is difficult, because there are rarely witnesses available to testify about how long the defect existed. A property owner may also try to prove that the defect is so obvious that the victim should have seen it and avoided it, because property owners are not liable for such open and obvious dangers.

Trespassers A property owner, whether government or private, is not generally liable for injuries to trespassers. A trespasser is defined as someone who is not authorized to be present on the property. Trespassing is often an issue with regard to premises liability cases, particularly those occurring on playgrounds or public parks. Many playgrounds and public parks close after dusk, and by law, the government will most likely not be held liable for an injury that occurs after the property is closed. The trespassing defense does have exceptions. If the property owner knows, or should know, that trespassers are frequently on the property, they may still be liable for injuries to trespassers. In addition, a property owner will still be liable where they know, or should know, that children are likely to trespass, which may also be called an “attractive nuisance.” [Caution sign image courtesy of pixabay]

In addition, one-hundred sixty-eight children, aged fifteen or younger, required emergency responses for near-fatal incidents in pools or spas during the same period. Specifically, during the summer of 2012, California had ten children under the age of fifteen drown in a pool or spa. While these figures cover only the summer of 2012, it is important to remember that with many indoor community pools, hotel pools and outdoor pools in warm-weather areas like southern California, the danger has does not necessarily end with summer. Typically, there are 390 pool or spa-related drownings that occur each year for children younger than fifiteen, based on statistics from the last few years. About 5,200 pool or spa-related emergency department treated submersion injuries occur each year for children younger than fifteen.

The Consumer Product Safety Commissions statistics indicate that fifty-four of the child drownings occurred soon after the children left an adult who was in their immediate vicinity. In addition, thirty-one children drowned despite the presence of others at the pool.

Young children and toddlers are particularly vulnerable to drowning, at least one hundred of the children that drowned during the summer of 2012 were younger than five. In fact, drowning is the leading cause of unintentional death among children one to four years of age.

In order to reduce child drownings, the Consumer Product Safety Commission provides information that parents, caregivers and pool owners should take to ensure that children, and adults, stay safe around pools and spas:

**Stay close, be alert and watch children in an around the pool. Never leave children unattended in a pool or spa and always watch children closely around all bodies of water. Make sure to teach children basic water safety tips and keep children away from pool drains, pipes and other openings.

**Learn and practice water safety skills. Every family member should know how to swim. It is also a good idea for family members to perform CPR on both children and adults.

**Have appropriate equipment for your pool or spa. This includes pool fencing, a lockable safety cover for spas, proper drain covers to avoid entrapment, and lifesaving equipment such as life rings and a reaching pole.

In the event that a child is injured or deceased, due to the negligence of a pool owner or other supervising adult, you may be entitled to a recovery. While no amount of money will fully compensate you for a child’s injury or death, it is important to make sure that the negligent person responsible for your child’s safety is held responsible.

At the scene of the crash, officers from the California Highway Patrol (CHP) took photographs of Nicole’s mangled body, presumably for some kind of investigative purposes. The pictures show that the accident nearly took her head off and left her covered in blood. Those photographs were never supposed to have been seen by anyone outside the department. However, for reasons that are not clear, two officers subsequently leaked them on the internet. In the aftermath of the leak, the Catsouras family had to endure knowing that the pictures of their once-beautiful daughter were available for the world to see and comment on. They also received anonymous letters in the mail. The letters maligned their parenting abilities, criticized their daughter, and made cruel comments about the grisly pictures.

The Catsouras family spent a great deal of time, money, and effort trying to get the pictures taken down. Sometimes, they were successful in getting websites to remove the pictures, only to have them pop up on other sites a few days later. Finally, feeling that their efforts were futile, the family filed a suit against CHP. The California invasion of privacy lawsuit was originally dismissed by an Orange County Superior Court judge on the grounds that the CHP had not breached any legal duty owed to the family. Our San Diego injury lawyer knows that at that time, California tort law did not allow an invasion of privacy claim for survivors. However, Nicole’s parents refused to give up, and in 2010, an appeals court reversed the dismissal of the claim and officially recognized the right for surviving family members to sue for invasion of privacy in cases involving photographs of their deceased loved ones.

The case then dragged on for over a year before finally resulting in a multi-million dollar settlement this week. As part of the settlement agreement, the CHP also pledged their assistance in trying to get the images removed from the web. Experts have told the family that they will likely never be able to completely scrub the images from the internet, but Nicole’s parents have not given up on their efforts. Hopefully, because of their unrelenting pursuit of justice, the CHP will take the extra precautions to ensure that other photographs or sensitive information will not be leaked in the future, and other families will not have to suffer in the aftermath of tragedy.

See Our Related Blog Posts:

Five Injured, One Killed in San Diego Bay Tragedy

Jury Awards $1.68 Million to Abandoned Diver

The difficulty in valuing personal injury cases usually because general damages are so difficult to value. General damages are commonly referred to as “pain and suffering” damages, but are really much more than just the pain and suffering someone has endured due to a personal injury accident. Indeed, the California jury instructions describes those damages to include shock, anxiety, worry, embarrassment, disfigurement, grief, fear, the loss of enjoyment of life, in addition to pain and suffering. There is no set value on general damages and these damages are determined on a case by case basis.

An ongoing case here in San Diego illustrates the difficulty in valuing pain and suffering damages in injury and death cases. In 2008, a Navy jet malfunctioned and crashed into a suburban San Diego neighborhood. The crash was tragic, and claimed the lives of four people, the wife, mother-in-law, and two infant children of Don Yoon, who was not in the home at the time. As a result of the crash, Yoon sued the Navy, who has admitted its liability for the accident. The trial that began this week is simply about the value of the case.

What is the value of the case to Mr. Yoon? Here is a man whose young wife and two young children were taken from him due to someone else’s negligence. Of course, to Mr. Yoon there is no sum of money that could compensate him for his loss, and he would no doubt give up anything to have his family back. But in a San Diego courthouse, a judge is going to have to place a value on the lives of all those lost.

According to new accounts, the two parties tried to settle the case prior to trial but simple could not agree. The government has apparently offered just under $1 million to the family, but Mr. Yoon’s attorneys have demanded $56,000.00. The reality is that ten different juries would probably view Mr. Yoon’s loss differently, and make ten different awards. The judge in this case has his work cut out for him.

A good personal injury lawyer will make every effort to highlight the aspects of the case that have the most impact on the injured person’s life. More important than the literal pain caused by the accident is the impact the accident has had on the persons quality of life and the ability to enjoy life. Being able to articulate those damages is where the value of a case lies.

See our related blog post:

What are “pain and suffering” damages?

In early September of this year, a power outage occurred at a San Diego sewage treatment center. The outage caused a malfunction in the sewage treatment plant’s operations, which resulted in sewage leaking out into several San Diego area water bodies. As a result, miles of beaches had to be closed to the public because of the risk of water contamination leading to disease. When the leak initially occurred, the city of San Diego alerted the public, but they failed to provide accurate information as to the severity of the leak and how much sewage had actually escaped.

According to NBC San Diego, the city has now released an updated estimate of how much sewage leaked from the plant. Overall, the city is now reporting that approximately 3.5 million gallons of sewage leaked into various area bodies of water, including the Sweet Water River and the San Diego Bay. This number is 60% higher than what was originally reported.

In situations like this, it is hard to determine whether the initial reports were intentionally misleading or were just the result of miscalculations or mistakes. However, regardless of why the initial numbers were wrong, the fact remains that the spill was very hazardous to human health and life. Certainly, a big question going forward is how the city can change its plant’s operations in order to ensure that a mere power outage does not cause such a dangerous situation in the future. But for any victims who fell ill as a result of the San Diego sewage leak, the more pressing questions are why this happened and who was responsible.

Raw sewage contains a variety of bacteria, viruses, and parasites that can cause a number of different diseases and, in some cases, even death. This is precisely why the job that sewage treatment plants are supposed to perform is so important. Without being treated, the bacteria and viruses in raw sewage would live on and eventually contaminate water supplies and make a lot of people very sick. The types of illnesses and injuries that can result from exposure to water that is contaminated with sewage vary. Some of the symptoms associated with the more common diseases like Tetanus, Hepatitis A, and Leptospirosis include fever, chills, stomach cramps, muscle aches, headache, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.

The victims who were affected by this recent sewage leak should see a doctor immediately, especially if they have suffered any of these symptoms. Some of the illnesses caused by sewage leaks can continue to affect the victims for many years afterwards, so it is important for victims to identify whether or not they are still infected, even if their symptoms have lessened or gone away.

In addition, victims should contact a San Diego injury attorney to see if they have any rights against the city for the illnesses and injuries they have suffered. Our San Diego personal injury attorney at the Walton Law Firm is equipped to deal with toxic tort cases such as this one and to help the victims get the compensation they deserve. For cases against a public entity, California requires that notice of the claim be filed with the state within just six months of the date of injury. This does not leave much time for injured victims to file their claims, so be sure to contact our injury lawyer today so that you do not miss your chance to enforce your rights.

See our related blog posts:

California Food Poisoning Risks Continue to Affect San Diego Residents

San Diego Assisted Living Facility Receives Citation

San Jose State chemistry professor Dan Straus had something in common with his father and his father’s buddy: all were academics. Straus’s father was a renown mathematician, and his dad’s buddy a theoretical physicist. You might have heard of the physicist, his name was Albert Einstein. When Straus’s father died, he bequeathed him a set of handwritten documents authored by Einstein, which Straus kept in his weekend cabin in Henry Coe State Park. In 2007, a huge fire raged through the park, destroying Straus’s cabin and all of its contents, including the papers.

The fire, it was later learned, was started by a former schoolteacher who, with her family, owned property nearby, and who left unattended a barrel she used to burn paper plates. In addition to destroying Straus’s cabin, three other residences were destroyed.

Strauss brought a property damage lawsuit against the teacher and her family, alleging they were negligent in starting the fire, and that they should compensate Straus for the loss of the irreplaceable documents. The question at trial was, what are the papers worth? After expert testimony on the value of the documents, and no doubt Straus’s testimony about the paper’s connection to his own father, the jury awarded him $750,000.

After the trial, he told reporters, “I’d much rather have those papers. But there has been justice.”

Not every document authored by Einstein was destroyed in the fire. Upon his birth in 1954, Einstein wrote a poem to Straus’s parents celebrating the birth. It reads, “This is what I wish: Let Daniel [Straus] be like his father, thoroughly intelligent and not less joyous. Yours, A. Einstein.” Luckily, he kept that document elsewhere, and told jurors after the trial he’ll transfer that document to a bank vault.

Source: San Jose Mercury News The San Diego County property damages lawyers at Walton Law Firm provide free consultations to individuals who have suffered valuable property loss due to the negligence of others. The firm also represents individuals who have been injured in all types of accidents, including animal attacks, automobile accidents, defective road design, pedestrian injuries, worksite injuries, and pedestrian injuries,

The Techno Power ride is a spinning ride that has multiple arms with six seats in pods at the end of each arm. The ride was immediately closed down after the accident, and will remain closed until state inspectors complete their investigation.

Fair operators are puzzled as to how the ride could have malfunctioned. “We go above what the state requires us to do as far as the rides are concerned. They are inspected and tested each and every day before the gates open,” said fair representative Linda Zweig.

Amusement parks such as that created by the San Diego County Fair can be liable for ride injuries under various theories of liability. The ride may be designed defectively or erected incorrectly, there could be mechanical defects, or it could be the result of operator error. Under each theory of liability, however, the operators of the park can be liable for all personal injuries caused by the accident.

Source: 10News.com

The amusement park injury lawyers at Walton Law Firm provide free consultations to individuals who have been injured in all types of accidents, including private property injuries, automobile accidents, defective road design, pedestrian injuries, worksite injuries, construction accidents, nursing home neglect, and malpractice matters. Call (760) 571-5500.

Since that time, there is the perennial battle of those for a free civil justice system and those for “tort reform,” who seek to limit what victims of malpractice can recover. Usually, these battles are waged on political partisan lines, and not without irony. The Democrats, often portrayed as big government advocates, argue for less regulation over the civil justice system, and Republicans, argue for more regulation.

Andrew Cochran from a blog called 7th Amendment Advocate makes an effective argument as to why conservatives should oppose tort reform. According to his bio, Mr. Cochran is a lifetime conservative and Republican who served as a political appointee in the Reagan Administration. He is also a lawyer, and a member of the Tea Party Nation and Tea Party Patriots. He believes that conservatives and Republicans should oppose tort reform efforts.

Citing the U.S. Constitution as his authority, Mr. Cochran makes several points as to why tort reform is not a conservative position:

We have a medical malpractice crisis, but not a medical liability crisis. The number of medical malpractice claims has been headed down – yes, DOWN – for years, down 15 percent from 1999 to 2008. The insurance industry’s own data reveals that the amount they’ve paid out for malpractice claims dropped by over 40% between 2002 and 2008, when adjusted for inflation. H.R. 5 is like fixing a flat tire by emptying the radiator. It misses the point and attacks a non-problem.
Medical malpractice today, religious liberty and gun rights tomorrow? There is no differentiation regarding medical malpractice lawsuits under the Constitution. This would be the same as capping damages in suits against schools firing Christian professors or limiting the size of gun clips.
The Founding Fathers were never for tort reform. Back in September, I offered to buy the best dinner in Washington to anyone to shows me just ONE pro-tort reform quote by any Founding Father. I’ve had no takers and I’m not worried, because none of them proposed limiting our 7th Amendment rights.

Read the entire blog post here.

The injustices caused by California’s cap on damages in medical malpractice cases are well known to those in this field. The law unfairly targets the children and the elderly, and deprives true victims of malpractice or elder abuse the justice they deserve.

The accident and personal injury lawyers at Walton Law Firm offer free consultations to individuals who have been injured in all types of accidents, including automobile accidents, pedestrian injuries, dog attacks / bites, worksite injuries, pedestrian injuries, construction accidents, property injuries, and malpractice matters. Call (760) 571-5500.

There is a very interesting legal story developing in Oceanside. Early on Christmas morning, 44-year-old Jimmy Misaalefua was gunned down in the cul-d-sac where he lived by his neighbor Robert Pulley. According to news accounts, Misaalefua was beloved in his community, a former Marine and college football player, who was an active volunteer in the Oceanside community. He left behind a wife and two children, a seven-year-old daughter and a six-year-old son, whose birthday was celebrated a week before his father’s death. A real tragedy.

The events leading up to Misaalefua death raise all kinds of legal questions about police conduct, and whether this tragedy could have been avoided.

According the North County Times, shortly before the shooting, fire fighters had been called to Pulley’s house in response to a 911 call where it had been reported that Pulley and assaulted his 20-year-old son. Apparently Pulley was acting belligerent, and it took several fire fighters to restrain him, which prompted a call to the Oceanside Police Department. When police officers arrived, they determined that this was nothing more than a domestic dispute, and no arrests were made. Police drove away at 2:40 a.m.

At 2:43 a.m. – only three minutes later – 911 was called that shots had been fired near the house and police returned to find Misaalefua dead or dying in the street.

It’s easy to second-guess the decisions made by police officers, especially when such a tragedy results, and they should usually be given the benefit of the doubt. This was, after all Christmas and there was probably some desire not to arrest a family man in home on Christmas. But some of the information coming out about Pully is very disturbing.

It was reported that Pulley owned eight guns, four of them registered to him. The murder weapon was a semi-automatic handgun (it’s not clear if that one was registered). In 2004 he was arrested and convicted of drinking and being in possession of a firearm. While that incident was six years ago (and reduced to a misdemeanor), just last month he engaged in an hours-long standoff with Oceanside police after he threatened to harm himself and his wife with a gun. It’s unclear how that matter was resolved, but despite the serious nature of the standoff it appears that Pulley was not arrested. With that background, and the presumed knowledge by the authorities that Pulley owned several guns, serious questions must be asked as to how he was allowed to keep guns in his house.

This story is now just unfolding. Pulley was charged yesterday with murder and other charges, and the Misaalefuas’ are trying to understand how this tragedy could have possibly occurred, and on Christmas of all days. One thing is for certain, there will be serious public questions raised about how a man with Pulley’s past, and his known possession of firearms, was allowed to keep guns in his home.

Source: North County Times

Based in North County, the Walton Law Firm represents individuals and families who have been impacted by all types of injury-producing incidents, including auto accidents, assault and battery, wrongful death claims, worksite injuries, elder abuse and neglect, sexual molestation, pedestrian injuries, construction accidents, property injuries, and malpractice matters. Call at (760) 571-5500 for a free and confidential consultation.

This is an amazing jury verdict. In 2004, Daniel Carlock was scuba diving with Ocean Adventures Dive Co. out of Los Angeles. During a dive near an oil rig, Carlock surfaced about 400 feet from the dive boat when he had trouble equalizing the pressure in his ears. As he tread on the surface of the water, and to his astonishment, his dive boat started to motor away.

As was established in his lawsuit, the dive-master on the boat marked Carlock as present, and then traveled to a different spot, where the group dived again and where (again) the dive-master marked Carlock as present. Meanwhile, Carlock was left floating alone in the foggy and sharky waters about 12 miles off the coast of Long Beach. He testified that he prayed to God to allow him to survive, and after about five hours bobbing in the sea, Boy Scouts passing in a nearby boat spotted him and he was rescued.

That’s the case. An obvious case of negligence that certainly warrants a measure of compensation., but $1.68 million?

In his lawsuit, Carlock claimed negligent infliction of emotional distress and fraud. It’s not clear what the basis for the fraud claims was, but he would certainly be entitled to damages for emotional distress. It doesn’t appear that he suffered any physical harm; although he did claim curiously that it caused him to develop skin cancer. How did the verdict get to be so high? We can only speculate that he had a very good lawyer – Scott Koepke of Los Angeles – and that the defendants were very unlikable. Such a huge award for emotional distress damages is very, very uncommon.

Carlock, of course, was very pleased. He told the LA Times, “It has been an ordeal, but I wanted to seek changes in the scuba industry. Others will benefit.”

Source: San Francisco Chronicle

The accident and injury attorneys at Walton Law Firm represent individuals who have been injured in all types of accidents, including car accidents, worksite injuries, nursing home neglect, food poisoning, pedestrian injuries, construction accidents, property injuries, and malpractice matters. Call at (760) 571-5500 for a free and confidential consultation, or fill out an online inquiry.